Tuesday, November 29, 2005

The Six Gun Shootout Last Longer Challenge

The first person has stepped up to the plate. Give a hearty round of applause for Drizzt for accepting my Six Gun Shootout Last Longer Challenge. I took first mover's privilege and chose -EV; Drizzt has CJ, the odds-on favorite. The wager is $10. May the best player suck out!

I'm still interested in taking other bets on the Six Gun Shootout. I am *that* confident in my boy -EV. If anyone else wants to take some of this action, just leave a comment or shoot me an email with your horse and proposed wager. Wagers can be blog-related, donkey-related, or for cold hard cash.

--

Here's a good one: can you spot what's wrong in this picture?

Read more...

Sunday, November 27, 2005

Thoughts on Tight Games, and My Line from Friday

In a fit of boredom this weekend, I spent some time playing the .10/.25 and .25/.50 NLHE cash games on Full Tilt. It's generally a bad idea for me to play when I'm bored, as it leads to poor decisions, but I managed to limit my donking off of chips to approximately $10-$15.

Every single table that I set at was super ridiculously tight. Finding a stone stober AlCantHang during a 3-day jaunt to Vegas would be easier than trying to get action out of these people when they're not holding a monster. Upping the pre-flop aggression wasn't the answer, either. I must have been raising damn near 25-30% of my hands (including such monsters as J9s, T5s and of course 72o), showing them down when nobody called preflop, and still I couldn't get any action. When I did get called, the action after the flop was even worse.

Part of the problem is that seemingly EVERYone at these Full Tilt small-stakes NLHE tables buys in short. A full buy-in is 100 BBs. I would say that anywhere from 50-70% buy in for 40 BBs, and another 10-15% buy in for 20 BBs. This almost ensures that these people aren't going to put any money in without a good starting hand and/or good chunk of the flop.

These games don't really suit my style, because my style is predicated on playing tight (though nowhere near as tight as these people) and making the occassional move. With everyone buying in short and standard preflop raises of 4 BBs, there isn't much room to "make moves" because you lose most of your folding equity if the hand goes past the flop. The result is that: (a) you get little action on your premium hands; (b) you win a bunch of small to tiny pots and lose the occassional medium pot when you get action past the flop; and (c) major, doubling-up type pots are practically non-existent.

The only real move you have in a game like that is to check-raise the flop, because most of the incredibly tight-weak players that populate these games will lay down anything short of top two pair to the check-raise. The danger is that the flop will check through, because the players are so tight-weak, and bam, you've just given a free card.

For me, the experiment ended when a guy slowrolled quad 8s on me. You might ask how it's possible to be slowrolled online, but it goes like this: Me: 46s in the SB. Half-price flop of 8-8-5 checks through 4-handed. Turn 4 puts two hearts out, I bet pot to see where things are, two folds, one call. River is an offsuit queen and my opponent has a touch less than the pot left in his stack because he is one of the aforementioned short buyers (bought in for 20 BBs, has 12 left). The alarm bells were ringing in my head that such a player wouldn't call the turn on a draw without the 8, but I was bored so I put him in. He then took his time to ponder the call, typed "hmmmmmmm" into the chat, waited a few more seconds then called and showed 88 for flopped quads, ending with a "lol" in the chat. I typed back "slowrolling is bush league" and he answered with "blah blah blah". That was enough for me!

The moral of this story is that if I intend to continue to play NLHE cash games online (not likely, as I still find it incredibly boring), I might be better served by moving some money back to Party Poker.

--

Friday, I posted the following:

NLHE cash game. You have 150BBs. Opponent has 100.

UTG, you catch AKo. This is your third premium hand in an orbit. The other two were KK and AA. Each time, you raised to 4xBB. Each time Opponent was the only caller and folded to a pot bet on a queen-high rainbow flop. Each time, you showed your hand to the table.

You raise to 4xBB and once again Opponent is the only caller. The flop is A-5h-6h. You pot it (8BBs into an 8BB pot), and opponent comes alive with a minimum-raise to 16BBs. Your move?


One critical piece of information that I intentionally left out was that this was a .10/.25 table. Thus, I generally expect the quality of the play not to be as high. In my mind, this looked like Opponent called with Ax and hit the ace. The question then became how to extract the maximum value from the hand, because as long as he doesn't have hearts, I most likely have him crushed (there is the two pair possibility, of course, but the 5 and 6 look like decent cards to me) as I'm ahead approximately 4-to-1 most of the time.

I decided upon the following line: call. Against this player, this will almost always elicit a big bet on the turn, which I can then profitably check-raise. Unfortunately for me, the 4h hit the turn and I had to reconsider. I didn't want to risk giving him a free draw to a flush, and I thought the heart might scare off my action anyway, so I went with the stop-and-go and came out for the pot again. When he raised me all-in for his last 40 BBs ($10), I was pretty sure I was screwed. I called anyway (this is the boredom call - very rare that I would stack off here with just top pair to raises on two streets and a threatening board) and he turned over Ah7h to prove to me that I was drawing dead. I guess it was perhaps unfortunate that, heads up, he had the exact draw that hit the board. To me, the only mistake was calling the turn raise, and I knew it was a mistake but let myself do it out of boredom and the fact that I was playing far below my usual stakes.

Donkey poker at it's finest.

Read more...

Thursday, November 24, 2005

Play Along at Home

NLHE cash game. You have 150BBs. Opponent has 100.

UTG, you catch AKo. This is your third premium hand in an orbit. The other two were KK and AA. Each time, you raised to 4xBB. Each time Opponent was the only caller and folded to a pot bet on a queen-high rainbow flop. Each time, you showed your hand to the table.

You raise to 4xBB and once again Opponent is the only caller. The flop is A-5h-6h. You pot it (8BBs into an 8BB pot), and opponent comes alive with a minimum-raise to 16BBs. Your move?

Read more...

O&E, Thanksgiving Edition

"I stand by my racial slur."
--Mayor "Diamond" Joe Quimby


There was a Blue Parrot game on Monday. I thought I'd be able to summon the creativity and wit to write something interesting about it. I was wrong. Go hit up the blogs of any of the other people who were there if you want to read about it. Here's a teaser of Pauly's table line-up:

Seat 6: F Train... the former teen idol pop singer in Norway quit the music industry and went to law school instead. Every once in a while a thirtysomething Scandinavian female (and former fan) sends him a pair of her unwashed undies. Sometimes he let's me sniff the dried pussy juice.

--

Speaking of Norway, I finally got around to picking up the new Royksopp album. Royksopp are a Norwegian electronica group that the LA ex introduced to me while I was living in the City of the Angels back in 2003 and she was taking her clothes off for twenties and singles. (Note to self: do NOT let Pauly or Grubby ever meet her.) I don't think the new album, "The Understanding", is quite as good as Royksopp's first effort, "Melody A.M.", but that's not to say I won't listen to it. In fact, I look forward to the day that I'm once again driving "Dawn Summers'" car so that I can subject her to my "euro crap".

--

I got to hang out with Spaceman last night for an evening of comedy and beer . The shows were pretty good, the company was great and the beer hit the spot. Nothing like a good belly laugh followed by shootin' the shit over a few brews in a local dive bar. Hopefully Spaceman enjoyed his last night in town. I'm not sure what could be better than beer, comedy and a little New York "stargazing". Maybe Amy. Sorry, Spaceman. I'll try to line her up next time you're here.

--

Vegas is in two weeks. Damn. Anybody interested in a last longer bet on the Six Gun Shootout? -EV is my horse. That may fly in the face of conventional wisdom that nobody will be able to take down luckbox CJ, but if anybody wants to put some money on it, I'm all ears.

--

Happy Thanksgiving.

Read more...

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Looks Like I Picked A Good Night to Play at the Blue Parrot

NYC Club Robbed at Gunpoint

Yeah. AC looking better every day.

In a related story, Oddjack announced today that it's closing up shop. Coincidence? I think not.

Blue Parrot post coming.

Read more...

Sunday, November 20, 2005

Got Tilt?

Some thoughts on tilt, and the two hands I played in the blogger tourney today:

Hand No. 1: raise it up with the Hammer to 3xBB, one caller. Flop is 9-high with two hearts and misses me completely. I check, opponent bets 75% pot, I call. Turn is Th, I bet 350 and take it down.

Hand No. 2: KK in the SB. UTG raises to 90, CO reraises to 200. Obviously, I put the CO on a big hand, but hard to know exactly what he has here. I probably did not reraise enough when I put in the third raise to 500. This raise should have been more in the range of 600-700, especially since I was out of position. Anyway, UTG folds, the CO calls(?), and the flop is J-high garbage. I only have 1200 left, pot is 1100, so I push. Luckbox calls with JJ. I suppose he could have had aces here too, but I'm not really sure how I can get away. If I bet 600, and he raises, I have to call because he could easily have QQ or be making a move with AK. I think I only get away from the hand if he smooth calls the flop. Anyway, this was the thinking that led me to push (might as well get my chips in first).

In the end, this one is probably my fault for not reraising enough pre-flop, but silly me thought that reraising to 500, in Level 1 of a tight blogger tourney, from the small blind, as the third raise in, would be enough to fold a marginal hand like jacks. After all, what else could I possibly have but KK/AA? I can console myself with the fact that, due to stack sizes, he made a slightly -EV call (called 300 to win 800 + my remaining 1200) and got lucky. Also points up why I should have reraised to 600-700.

Moving on --

Otis recently discussed various forms of tilt. It started me thinking, not about the ways in which I personally tilt, but about tilting other people.

Mama and Papa F-Train didn't tolerate any shit from Young F-Train or his siblings. They tried to instill in us some good Catholic values (probably failed) and beat the living crap out of us any time any one of us strayed too far from a morally acceptable path. Lying was a big no-no in my household growing up. My dad kept a paddle -- about two inches wide and twelve inches long -- that he used to "discipline" us when necessary, and if he caught us lying we were guaranteed to get hit at least as many times as our age with that thing. Believe you me, you learned at a fairly young age that lying was not good for your health or, at the least, for your ability to remain comfortably seated after being caught. Acting in a jerky manner was also grounds for a decent thrashing at my father's hand.

As a result of these beatings, it perhaps comes as no surprise that I believe in more direct forms of honesty than most people, and that generally I try not to act like an asshole. (For some of you who know me better than others, you may find that hard to believe. To you I say, "So's your face.") The honesty thing has never been much of an issue for me at the poker table, because bluffing is an accepted, even necessary, part of the game.

But what about purposefully trying to tilt someone?

Generally, for me, this type of behavior falls into the "jerky" category. Yet, all's fair in the war at the poker table, and putting someone into a such a tizzy that he steams off all of his chips is a perfectly acceptable tactic. The question is: how scummy is it to do? It's not my natural inclination to attempt to tilt someone unless they really, really piss me off, but in the end I don't think I really care if strangers that I'm sitting at a table with, in a casino, have a negative impression of my personality. (If I were sitting with friends, that would be something else entirely.)

I may have to put this plan into action during my next trip to AC, hopefully before the blogger get-together in Vegas in three weeks.

Read more...

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Up and Down

Put your makeup on, fix your hair up pretty
and meet me tonight in Atlantic City.
--Bruce Springsteen


Just don't meet me at the Borgata, or we're going to be waiting a long, long time for a table.

We had ourselves a little mini-con in AC yesterday at the Borgata. The august bloggers in attendance included:

1. Carter from Cuban Links
2. "Dawn Summers" from Clareified
3. Joaquin from My Little Poker Blog
4. Jordan from High on Poker
5. SoxLover from Fish Soup
6. Me!

It was great to see Carter and Jordan again, two guys that I don't get to see often enough and who are lots of fun. Carter was wearing a green t-shirt with the words "I Carry No Cash" written on the front in large white letters. (This elicited a comment from the table idiot that, in DC, the thugs speak "eboli" and wouldn't be able to understand the t-shirt anyway.) We almost managed to get four of us on the same NLHE table at once, but Jordan was quite happy with his very passive table and elected to stick it out over there.

God, the place was packed! The expansion of the poker room at the Borgata from 34 to 85 tables (currently scheduled to be completed in Q2 2006) cannot come soon enough. It's almost getting to the point where I don't want to play there anymore. Almost. The action on Saturday is still too juicy to pass up, especially post-midnight, but the problem is that if you get there at any time after noon on a Saturday, you have to wait 1 to 3 hours to get on a table. That's 1 to 3 hours that could be better spent playing at the Trop, the Taj or any of the newly opened AC rooms (Bally's, Harrah's, Caesar's, etc.) that don't have such deep waiting lists. When we pushed back from the felt last night around midnight, there were 72 players on the $1-$2 NLHE waiting list, and another 40 on the $2-$5 list!

I made some bad plays and I made some good plays. The hands that I was most proud of were two separate hands with pocket deuces where I moved people off of their hands after the flop. My bets and raises were getting lots of respect. All it took was showing down top set on the first hand that I took to showdown (cracking kings and doubling up from $250), and then mixing it up some, but not too much, afterwards. If I had been a smidgen more aggressive, I could have had complete control over the table (perhaps with one exception). The problem was that I had a very big stack on my immediate left (~$1100) who cramped my style a little bit. He wasn't a particularly tricky player, but I was careful to ensure that I didn't gift my stack to him.

In the end, it was some nice padding for the bankroll. Nothing MAJOR, but a few more weekends like this and I'll be in good shape for Vegas.

The WPBT Sunday Shootout Satellite, on the other hand, was a different story. It's very clear that I'm out of practice playing NLHE tournaments. I think the last one I played was a few months ago at a midtown club, and before that I have no idea. I donked off most of my chips in spectacular fashion, misplaying just about every hand I took past the flop. Maybe I'll do better next weekend, but this was a pretty ugly showing.

UPDATE: "Dawn" has written an amusing post about the trip. All of you other poker bloggers should thank Almighty God that she's not coming to Vegas, because she has a steel trap for a memory combined with a complete and total lack of hesitation about writing up anything she witnesses (first-hand, second-hand or third-hand). Plus, she's evil. And crazy.

Read more...

Thursday, November 10, 2005

DoubleAs Challenge - My Lines

I thought it might be interesting to discuss my lines from the recent DoubleAs challenge. Remember, I'm no pro, I'm just some dork who thinks about poker too much.

HAND NO. 1

You're dealt pocket tens in the cut-off of a 9-handed game. It is folded around to you. You have $1000, the button has you covered, the small blind has $700 and the big blind has $600. The button is tight/passive. The small blind is loose/passive and the big blind just got to the table and bought in for $600 instead of $1000. Decision: Do you limp, fold or raise? If you raise, how much?

Repeat after me: open-limping in this situation is a capital offense. I have a solid, but vulnerable, hand, that is up against two random hands in the blinds over whom I will have position on all streets. This hand was made for raising. Sure, sometimes, I might win just the blinds, but given that my own hand will be tricky to play after the flop, I'd prefer to narrow the range of the blinds a little bit with a raise. I make a pot-sized raise to $35.

The big blind was the only caller. The flop is KQ2 rainbow. The big blind checks. Decision: Do you check or bet? If you bet, how much?


Not a pretty flop for my tens, and the exact reason for raising preflop. Heads up, this situation is tailor-made for the continuation bet, especially since I know nothing about the big blind's playing style. If he pops me with a check-raise, I can release my hand and keep an eye on him. If he calls, I probably have to check through the turn and try to get a cheap river. Thus, my line is to bet $60 here (roughly 80% of the pot).

The big blind calls. The turn card is a ten completing the rainbow of suits. The big blind checks. Decision: Check or bet (how much?).


Well, this certainly is a great card for me, but the board is becoming a bit too coordinated. I bet $200 to discourage the big blind from coming any further.

The big blind goes all-in. Remember he has a shortish stack so you may be committed. You call?


Do the math here. He called $35 preflop, $60 on the flop, and my turn bet of $200. Thus, his all-in represents another $305 to me, with $895 in the pot, giving me approximately 3-to-1 odds. Since his probable range of hands does not include KK and QQ, I'm either way ahead or I have 10 outs to beat him (3.5-to-1 odds). Given the likelihood of being ahead, this is an easy call of $305. The big blind turned over AJ, and I missed the river. Moral of the story here: sometimes you get kicked in the junk.

This hand: -$600
Net: -$600 (poker sucks)

HAND NO. 2

The game is very aggressive. It is 6-handed and everybody except for the UTG player has a high aggression rating. You have pocket aces in the big blind. It is folded to the button who has $600 and raises to $35. The small blind folds. You have $1000. Decision: Do you call or raise? If you raise, how much?

For this hand, I think DoubleAs practically tells you what he feels the optimal line is, and I don't disagree with him. I call the raise to appear that I'm defending my blind. I'm trying to trap the over-aggressive button into a big pot.

The flop comes Jd 7h 3d. Decision: Do you check or bet? If you bet, how much?

Again, I'm pretty sure I can get the button to bet this flop, and while I could potentially try to build a pot by betting first, I don't want to scare him off just yet. This board is pretty raggedy. I check.

The button bets $75. Decision: Do you call or raise (how much?)

After electing not to raise pre-flop, I don't like giving a second "free" street right in this spot. He put in a bet like I expected him to, so here's where I pop him for the first time. I'll take my $100 if he folds. My line: check-raise to $200.

The button pushes all-in. You call?

In a heartbeat. DoubleAs played it the same way, saying, "I smooth-called preflop and check-raised the flop with an overbet in order for it to look like a bluff. The button in this hand had J9 and flopped top pair. My overbet looked like a bluff/draw so I got action and he didn't outdraw me on the turn/river."

This hand: +$600
Net: +$5 (Super Big Gulp is on me.)

HAND NO. 3

You're dealt 89s in the big blind. An EP player (no read) raises to $35 and there are three callers in MP/LP. The small blind folds. Everybody involved in the hand has between $800 and $1500. You have $1000. Decision: Do you call, fold or raise? If you raise, how much?

No need to get fancy with this one. Suited connectors in the blinds in a raised pot with 4 people in before me and no chance to be re-raised. While it seem reasonable to infer that all the subsequent callers are weak, and you could probably push them out with a raise, you can't stand a reraise, and I'd rather play suited connectors in a family pot. Calling is, in my mind, the best play.

The flop comes 7d 6h 2c. Decision: Do you check or bet? If you bet, how much?

Garbage flop, generally a good blind flop, but in this situation (raised 5-way pot) someone can easily be holding a set or an overpair. I check in order to see how things develop.

The preflop raiser bets $150. Everyone folds to you. Decision: Do you fold, call or raise (how much?)

Well, that's interesting. I don't think you can just flat call here. It's too obvious that you're drawing if you do. The options really are either to raise or fold. I elected to raise to $400. Bad move on my part as the pre-flop raiser responded by going all-in for the rest of my stack. At that point, pot odds probably dictated I should call, but because I'm a chicken-shit pussy, I folded.

This hand: -$425 (not including the forced Big Blind)
Net: -$420 (smoke if you got em)

HAND NO. 4

You are dealt red pocket aces in MP. It is folded to you and you raise to $35. You are called by a LP player and the big blind. You have $1000 and the other two players have you covered. The flop is KcTh2c. The big blind checks. Decision: Do you check or bet? If you bet, how much?

This board is too coordinated to check and hope that the LP player puts in a bet. I elected for a bet of $100.

The LP player calls and the big blind folds. The turn is the 5c. Decision: Do you check or bet? If you bet, how much?

Obviously, that's an ugly card as it completes the flush. If this were a live game, I'd fire out a bet, and if I got raised, I'd go with my gut as to whether or not he had it. Since this hand is occurring online, I don't have that luxury and I decide to check.

The LP player goes all-in. Decision: Do you call?

Ugh. Of -course- he goes all-in. Why? Because this move eats tight-weak players for lunch. But thinking it through, I just can't see him going all-in with the nuts here, or even with a strong flush, because it leaves no room for extracting value from the hand. He could hold a set and be scared of a fourth heart hitting, trying to take the hand down on the turn. Or he could hold nothing at all. Without much information about his hand, I think I have to call him down here and take my lumps if I'm drawing at an ace. The LP player had KsQs and did not get any help on the river.

This hand: +$1,040
Net: +$620 (reversal of fortune)

HAND NO. 5

You are dealt AsKs in the big blind. A LAG raises in MP to $35 and the button calls. You all have about $1000. Decision: Do you fold, call or raise? If you raise, how much?

I know a couple of things here. 1) I know I hate playing AK from the blinds; 2) I know I hate playing AK in a 3-way pot; and 3) I know I hate playing against LAGs who have position on me. All of these things spell out R-E-R-A-I-S-E. I bumped it up to $150.

The LAG calls your raise and the button folds. The flop come Ts 8s 2s. You have the nuts. Decision: Do you check or bet? If you bet, how much?

Well damn, if I had known I was going to flop the nuts, I wouldn't have raised so much! Now I feel almost contractually obligated to follow through with a bet, and hope that I can get the LAG to raise me on either a bluff or a bad flush draw. I bet $200, but the LAG folded his red suited connectors. Boooooooo.

This Hand: +$190
Net: +$810 (starting to get somewhere)

HAND NO. 6

You are dealt pocket queens in EP and raise to $35. A new player (who doubled up in his first five hands by calling all-in preflop with aces..must be nice) in LP reraises to $80. Everyone folds to you. You have about $1500 and your opponent has you covered. Decision: Do you call, fold or raise? If you raise, how much?

Well, there are two ways to go here. Personally, QQ out of position is tricky to play. It's certainly not a monster, even heads up, that would allow a smooth call. For this one, I think you reraise. Now, most of the time, if you're up against KK or AA, they will just smooth call and let you hang yourself later, but at least with a reraise you give yourself a fighting chance to get away from the hand if you're beat. I reraised to $200. My opponent did me a huge favor and went all-in. Easy fold. He had aces.

This Hand: -$200
Net: +$610 (win some, lose some)

HAND NO. 7

You are dealt Ts9s on the button. There are two limpers before you, both of whom have over $1000. You have $1000. The blinds have $700 and $800 respectively. Decision: Do you limp, fold or raise? If you raise, how much?

When I have the button and a medium-strength hand, and nobody has shown much aggression, I often like to get frisky. Suited connectors are a perfect hand for that, because you have quite a bit of optionality regarding how you want to play the hand post-flop. Thus, I raised to $50. Too bad for me, everyone folded.

This Hand: +$35
Net: +$645

HAND NO. 8

You are dealt 55 on the button. A player in EP raises to $35. It is folded to you. The EP player has $900 and you have $1100. Both blinds have around $1000. Decision: Do you fold, call or raise? If you raise, how much?

If you only learn one thing about playing NL cash games from me, learn this: unless the stacks are short, you almost always have the odds to justify calling a raise with a pocket pair. Your implied odds of hitting your set are just about through the roof, especially if you have position on the raiser. I would advise against getting overly aggressive and re-raising here, because if you are called or raised, you're going to be miserable most of the time. Thus, I would call here.

Both blinds fold. The flop comes 9h 5h 4d. The EP player checks. Decision: Do you check or bet? If you bet, how much?

Huzzah. Set! Now, how to play it? I always find it interesting when an EP player, who has raised pre-flop, checks the flop. Especially here, where the action is heads up. It makes me suspect that he might have woken up with kings or aces, in which case, betting here will almost ensure that I get check-raised (at which point, I call, and then try to get it all-in on the turn). This is kind of a junky board, so I don't need to bet much here. I elected for $50 into the $85 pot. Unfortunately, the EP player folded. Turns out he had AK and wasn't even willing to try to buy the pot without hitting the flop.

This Hand: +$50
Net: +$695

Comments? Questions? Disagreement?

Read more...

Monday, November 07, 2005

Choose Your Own Adventure

Remember those Choose Your Own Adventure books from when you were a kid? Well, DoubleAs tried something similar on his blog last week. He posted eight hands from 5/10 NL where he knew his own cards and his opponents cards (either because the hand went to showdown or because the opponent showed the cards). Your job is to play DoubleAs' hand in each case, making your choice on each street as presented -- and also without peeking at how the action develops for the other choices. It was a fun, and interesting read. Here are the links:

What Would You Do? - First Set of Choices
DoubleAs Challenge - Second Set of Choices
DoubleAs Challenge - Third Set of Choices
DoubleAs Challenge - Final Set of Choices
What Would You Do? - Results

Of twelve people who submitted official entries to DoubleAs, the winner was someone who netted +$785 from the eight hands. Yours truly didn't submit an official entry, but would have netted +$700 if he had, and barely lost the contest to rename DoubleAs' blog for a week. Enjoy, and good luck!

Read more...

Sunday, November 06, 2005

Well, I Finally Did It

I cashed out the last remaining money I had in an online poker site.

The realization came to me this evening that the money is either better served in my cash bankroll or perhaps invested in some other way. For better or worse, I don't have the patience for online poker anymore. I find it tedious, anti-social and unexhilirating. I'm still a net winner (I've stopped playing holdem and razz has been kind to me), but the limits at which I would prefer to play razz are so hit-or-miss (as to whether any game will be going) that I don't see the point in keeping the money in the site anymore.

It didn't help that I decided to play some limit holdem for the first time in a while (8/16) and lost the only two hands of note that I played in an hour. I'll spare the bad-beat details except to say that I was a 7-to-1 heads up favorite in one and got called down by an unimproved ace in a three-way pot after betting a big draw hard the whole way in the other. I was happy with the way I played both hands, but obviously the results speak for themselves. That cemented that my love affair with limit holdem is over; I don't play NL holdem cash games online; and if they can't keep razz spread at my limits, what's the point of keeping the bankroll there?

A trip to AC is coming very, very soon.

Read more...

Friday, November 04, 2005

The Poker Blogger Alphabet

For the lack of any poker content to dissect on this fine site, I decided to put together a little poker blogger alphabet. The idea was to stay away from referencing any particular bloggers as much as possible, but more to encompass items or ideas that make the community as much fun as it is. Check it out:

A is for Acceptance.
B is for Bonus Code: IGGY.
C is for Comraderie Comradery (spelling for the win).
D is for Dial-a-shot.
E is for Excalibur.
F is for F-Train (of course!).
G is for G-Rob.
H is for "Hammah!"
I is for IM-a-shot.
J is for JOPKE.
K is for Kicked in the Junk.
L is for the Long Run.
M is for Min-Raises, That Make Baby Jesus Cry.
N is for Nothin' But the Nuts.
O is for Original Content.
P is for Poker Blogger.
Q is for Quads, Bitches.
R is for Razz. (See also, 'K'.)
S is for SoCo.
T is for Twice Thrice-Confirmed Huge.
U is for Uber Post.
V is for Vegas, baby, Vegas.
W is for WPBT.
X is for e(X)istential Conversations, With or Without Strippers
Y is for Yelling "LIVE FOUR!"
Z is for Zip. Zero. Zilch. (the Number of Things I Could Think Of For 'Z'.)

Feel free to leave your own suggestions /improvements in the comments.

Read more...

Back to TOP